Who this may be relevant for
This page may be relevant if you were physically injured and are asking whether a civil, insurance or institutional path is worth reviewing. It does not decide that a claim exists and does not estimate prospects.
What is reviewed at a general level
At a general level, the review looks at what happened, what evidence exists, who may be the relevant party, and which parallel paths — for example National Insurance or a personal policy — need separate attention. The details change from case to case.
Points worth understanding first
Bodily injury is an umbrella term. Sometimes the path is civil toward the person who caused the injury, sometimes insurance-based, and sometimes institutional. Do not assume that one path cancels another, and do not calculate a limitation period from the site.
What to have ready for a call
For a call, a short description of what happened, roughly when, and which party has already contacted you is enough. Do not bring a medical file to the form and do not send injury photographs.
Sources checked
- Torts Ordinance [New Version] · 2026-08-25
- Limitation Law, 5718-1958 · 2026-08-25
The next step
If you were injured and want the options reviewed, you can call or leave short details. Do not send medical records through the form.